Real data comparison
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
On quality, Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) leads (57.6 vs 46.4). On price, SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 is cheaper ($2.40 vs $8.00 per 1M). In real production usage, SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 is used more (rank #78 vs #339 of 353).
- Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)
- SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
Usage share over time
| # | Model | Share of usage |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 | 0.29% |
Daily tracking began Sep 22- this becomes a live chart once there's a third day to plot.
Frequently asked questions
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7: which is better quality?
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 46.4).
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7: which is cheaper?
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 is cheaper at $2.40/1M vs $8.00/1M.
Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7: which is used more?
SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #78 vs #339 of 353).
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of September 23, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.