SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Themed ranking

Best for coding

Ranked by real coding-task usage share, weighted across nine real OpenRouter coding tags (file I/O, debugging, code review, and more).

As of November 7, 2026, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) ranks #1 for best for coding at coding traffic share 53.7%.

  1. #1 DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) - Coding traffic share 53.7%
  2. #2 Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch) - Coding traffic share 12.8%
  3. #3 OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna (batch) - Coding traffic share 6.0%
  4. #4 OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol (batch) - Coding traffic share 5.0%
  5. #5 Crouton Alpha - Coding traffic share 4.8%
  6. #6 Tencent: Hy4 preview - Coding traffic share 2.6%
  7. #7 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash - Coding traffic share 2.6%
  8. #8 Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch) - Coding traffic share 1.8%
  9. #9 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro - Coding traffic share 1.7%
  10. #10 MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash - Coding traffic share 1.5%
23 eligible models, sorted by coding traffic share
#ModelCoding traffic share
01DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)53.7%
02Z.ai: GLM 5.3 Flash (batch)12.8%
03OpenAI: GPT-6 Luna (batch)6.0%
04OpenAI: GPT-6.1 Sol (batch)5.0%
05Crouton Alpha4.8%
06Tencent: Hy4 preview2.6%
07Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.6-Flash2.6%
08Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)1.8%
09MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro1.7%
10MiniMax: MiniMax M3.1 Flash1.5%
11OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)1.5%
12Meta: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor1.3%
13Tencent: Hy41.1%
14DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 04230.9%
15Tencent: Hy30.9%
16NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (free)0.6%
17Anthropic: Claude Opus 5.5 (batch)0.5%
18NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free)0.2%
19Z.ai: GLM 5.20.2%
20Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch)0.1%
21NVIDIA: Nemotron 3 Ultra (free)0.0%
22Thinking Machines: Inkling0.0%
23Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 5.5 (batch)0.0%

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of November 7, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.