Real data comparison
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
On quality, OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) leads (60.9 vs 56). On price, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is cheaper ($0.75 vs $4.00 per 1M). In real production usage, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is used more (rank #12 vs #24 of 312).
- Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
- OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Head-to-head by real task
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) leads 1 of 3 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) leads 1. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.
| Task | Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Dispatch | 2.5% | 4.1% |
| Repo Scanning | 3.0% | 2.4% |
| File I/O | 2.3% | 2.3% |
Usage share over time
- Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
- OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch)
Frequently asked questions
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch): which is better quality?
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (60.9 vs 56).
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch): which is cheaper?
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is cheaper at $0.75/1M vs $4.00/1M.
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch): which is used more?
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #12 vs #24 of 312).
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch): which wins more real-world task categories?
Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) and OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Sol (batch) split the 3 shared task categories evenly.
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 28, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.