SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

On quality, SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 leads (60.9 vs 56). On price, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is cheaper ($0.75 vs $3.00 per 1M). In real production usage, Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is used more (rank #12 vs #41 of 312).

  • Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
  • SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
Quality (Intelligence Index)56 / 60.9
Price ($/1M blended)$0.75 / $3.00
Average usage share2.42% / 0.53%
Best provider uptime100.0% / 100.0%
Coding index76.1 / 76.8
Agentic index45.1 / 58.7
Context window1,048,576 / 500,000
Quality per dollar74.7 pts/$ / 20.3 pts/$

Usage share over time

6.90%5.18%3.45%1.73%0.00%Share of usageAug 13Aug 20Aug 27
  • Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch)
  • SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

Frequently asked questions

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6: which is better quality?

SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6 scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (60.9 vs 56).

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6: which is cheaper?

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) is cheaper at $0.75/1M vs $3.00/1M.

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) vs SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6: which is used more?

Google: Gemini 3.7 Flash (batch) has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #12 vs #41 of 312).

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 28, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.