Real data comparison
Tencent: Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-flash
On price, Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper ($0.03 vs $0.23 per 1M). In real production usage, Tencent: Hy3 is used more (rank #3 vs #14 of 291).
- Tencent: Hy3
- Ling-3.0-flash
Price ($/1M blended)$0.23 / $0.03
Average usage share11.88% / 2.05%
Context window262,144 / 262,144
Usage share over time
- Tencent: Hy3
- Ling-3.0-flash
Frequently asked questions
Tencent: Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-flash: which is better quality?
Quality data is unavailable for one or both models.
Tencent: Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-flash: which is cheaper?
Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper at $0.03/1M vs $0.23/1M.
Tencent: Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-flash: which is used more?
Tencent: Hy3 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #3 vs #14 of 291).
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 9, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.