SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

Ling-3.0-flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

On quality, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 leads (38 vs 37.8). On price, Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper ($0.03 vs $0.18 per 1M). In real production usage, Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 is used more (rank #2 vs #14 of 291).

  • Ling-3.0-flash
  • Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Quality (Intelligence Index)37.8 / 38
Price ($/1M blended)$0.03 / $0.18
Average usage share2.05% / 12.72%
Coding index50.6 / 56.8
Agentic index29.3 / 24.4
Context window262,144 / 1,050,000
Quality per dollar1200.0 pts/$ / 217.1 pts/$

Usage share over time

21.85%16.39%10.93%5.46%0.00%Share of usageJul 5Jul 22Aug 8
  • Ling-3.0-flash
  • Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Frequently asked questions

Ling-3.0-flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5: which is better quality?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (38 vs 37.8).

Ling-3.0-flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5: which is cheaper?

Ling-3.0-flash is cheaper at $0.03/1M vs $0.18/1M.

Ling-3.0-flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5: which is used more?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #2 vs #14 of 291).

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of August 9, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.