SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Provider reliability · tracked daily

Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): which provider is most reliable?

Across 4 providers, Google is the most reliable way to run Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch), at 100.0% uptime and 457ms median latency. Measured directly from OpenRouter's endpoint data, tracked daily.

  1. Google - 100.0% uptime · 457ms
  2. Anthropic - 100.0% uptime · 645ms
  3. Amazon Bedrock - 100.0% uptime · 934ms
  4. Azure - -

Uptime is OpenRouter's own trailing-30-minute metric, captured once at our last daily sync - a snapshot of that window, not a live/real-time feed.

All 4 providers, latest snapshot
#ProviderUptime (30m)Latency p50Throughput
01Google100.0%457ms74 tok/s
02Anthropic100.0%645ms69 tok/s
03Amazon Bedrock100.0%934ms41 tok/s
04Azure---

Uptime over time

#ModelUptime (%)
01Anthropic100%
02Google100%
03Amazon Bedrock100%
04Azure-

Daily tracking began Aug 9- this becomes a live chart once there's a third day to plot.

Frequently asked questions

Which provider is most reliable for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)?

Google is the most reliable provider for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch), at 100.0% uptime (OpenRouter's trailing-30-minute metric, snapshotted at our last daily sync) and 457ms median latency, out of 4 providers tracked.

What is Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)'s uptime?

The best-performing provider for Anthropic: Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) reports 100.0% uptime, tracked daily.