SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)

On quality, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) leads (39.5 vs 34.3). On price, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper ($0.19 vs $0.20 per 1M). In real production usage, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is used more (rank #2 vs #4 of 353). Across 25 real task categories where both models have classified traffic, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) handles more of the traffic in 14 of them.

  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Quality (Intelligence Index)34.3 / 39.5
Price ($/1M blended)$0.19 / $0.20
Average usage share14.37% / 10.69%
Best provider uptime100.0% / 100.0%
Context window1,310,720 / 1,048,576
Quality per dollar180.5 pts/$ / 197.5 pts/$

Head-to-head by real task

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 leads 11 of 25 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) leads 14. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Content Writing30.7%3.9%
Roleplay & Fiction32.0%7.8%
Memory Extraction25.9%4.4%
Data Transformation23.9%3.4%
Conversation24.9%5.1%
Math25.0%7.1%
Q&A & Knowledge22.2%5.7%
Debugging5.0%17.0%
Code Generation4.4%15.7%
Customer Support13.2%2.8%
File I/O4.9%14.9%
DevOps & Config4.4%14.3%
Web Search15.7%7.2%
Shell Execution8.3%16.4%
SQL & Database5.0%11.7%
Finance & Trading12.5%6.2%
Frontend & UI5.3%11.5%
Repo Scanning7.9%13.7%
Security Audit13.4%18.5%
Research & Reports11.9%9.4%
Tool Dispatch7.8%9.1%
Code Review8.0%9.2%
Workflow Execution9.3%10.2%
Multi-step Planning10.8%11.4%
DevOps12.6%12.7%

Usage share over time

24.64%18.48%12.32%6.16%0.00%Share of usageJul 5Aug 13Sep 22
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch): which is better quality?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 34.3).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch): which is cheaper?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 is cheaper at $0.19/1M vs $0.20/1M.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch): which is used more?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #2 vs #4 of 353).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch): which wins more real-world task categories?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) handles more traffic in 14 of 25 shared task categories where both models have classified OpenRouter usage.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of September 23, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.