DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) ranks #20 of 94 models by Artificial Analysis quality score (39.5) at $0.20/1M tokens blended - and ranks #4 of 353 by average real OpenRouter usage share over the trailing 80-day window (10.69%). Available from 26 providers at up to 100.0% uptime.
- Quality (Intelligence Index) - 39.5
- Coding index - -
- Agentic index - -
- Price (blended $/1M) - 0.20
- Context window - 1,048,576
- Usage rank - #4 of 353
- Providers - 26
- Open/closed - open
Usage share over time
What DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is actually used for
Share of each real task category's classified traffic this model handles, from OpenRouter's task classification.
| Task | Share of task traffic |
|---|---|
| Security Audit | 18.5% |
| Debugging | 17.0% |
| Shell Execution | 16.4% |
| Code Generation | 15.7% |
| File I/O | 14.9% |
| DevOps & Config | 14.3% |
| Repo Scanning | 13.7% |
| DevOps | 12.7% |
Compare DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
Frequently asked questions
What is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)'s quality score?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) scores 39.5 on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index, ranking #20 of 94 models with a published score.
How much does DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) cost?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) costs $0.20 per 1M tokens (blended 75% prompt / 25% completion pricing).
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) widely used?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) ranks #4 of 353 models by average real OpenRouter usage share, averaging 10.69% of classified token volume over the trailing 80-day window.
Is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) open-weight or closed?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is an open-weight model.
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of September 23, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.
