SmophyAI

Published daily · Next update 02:00 UTC

Real data comparison

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)

On quality, Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch) leads (44.8 vs 39.5). On price, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is cheaper ($0.52 vs $0.88 per 1M). In real production usage, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is used more (rank #3 vs #20 of 373). Across 11 real task categories where both models have classified traffic, DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) handles more of the traffic in 11 of them.

  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
  • Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)
Quality (Intelligence Index)39.5 / 44.8
Price ($/1M blended)$0.52 / $0.88
Average usage share14.38% / 1.85%
Best provider uptime100.0% / 100.0%
Context window1,048,576 / 1,048,576
Quality per dollar75.2 pts/$ / 50.7 pts/$

Head-to-head by real task

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) leads 11 of 11 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch) leads 0. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.

TaskDeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)
DevOps & Config48.1%4.8%
Code Generation32.8%1.9%
Shell Execution31.4%4.4%
Repo Scanning28.2%2.4%
Security Audit32.1%10.9%
Debugging24.5%3.3%
File I/O19.8%1.9%
SQL & Database17.2%1.5%
Code Review17.0%3.2%
DevOps13.3%2.6%
Tool Dispatch11.2%2.0%

Usage share over time

32.33%24.24%16.16%8.08%0.00%Share of usageAug 19Sep 13Oct 8
  • DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch)
  • Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch)

Frequently asked questions

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch): which is better quality?

Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch) scores higher on Artificial Analysis's Intelligence Index (44.8 vs 39.5).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch): which is cheaper?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) is cheaper at $0.52/1M vs $0.88/1M.

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch): which is used more?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #3 vs #20 of 373).

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 5.3 (batch): which wins more real-world task categories?

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) handles more traffic in 11 of 11 shared task categories where both models have classified OpenRouter usage.

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of October 9, 2026.

Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).

Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology

Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.