Real data comparison
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3
On price, Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper ($0.23 vs $0.45 per 1M). In real production usage, Tencent: Hy3 is used more (rank #7 vs #8 of 353). Across 6 real task categories where both models have classified traffic, OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) handles more of the traffic in 5 of them.
- OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
- Tencent: Hy3
Head-to-head by real task
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) leads 5 of 6 shared task categories by real classified traffic share; Tencent: Hy3 leads 1. Not a benchmark score - this is what developers actually route to each model for, per OpenRouter's task classification.
| Task | OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) | Tencent: Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Dispatch | 31.6% | 1.6% |
| Multi-step Planning | 7.4% | 1.9% |
| Research & Reports | 7.4% | 2.1% |
| Translation | 5.8% | 2.4% |
| File I/O | 3.2% | 5.7% |
| Workflow Execution | 6.8% | 4.4% |
Usage share over time
- OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch)
- Tencent: Hy3
Frequently asked questions
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3: which is better quality?
Quality data is unavailable for one or both models.
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3: which is cheaper?
Tencent: Hy3 is cheaper at $0.23/1M vs $0.45/1M.
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3: which is used more?
Tencent: Hy3 has higher real OpenRouter usage share (rank #7 vs #8 of 353).
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) vs Tencent: Hy3: which wins more real-world task categories?
OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna (batch) handles more traffic in 5 of 6 shared task categories where both models have classified OpenRouter usage.
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of September 23, 2026.
Benchmark scores: Artificial Analysis (artificialanalysis.ai) via OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings).
Methodology: www.smophy.ai/benchmark/methodology
Token counts originate from each provider's own tokenizer and are not directly comparable across providers.